Centrally sponsored schemes
Release-to-utilisation reconciliation across states and districts, with diversion between centrally sponsored and state pools surfaced separately.
Union Ministries
Ministries release funds at a scale no manual review can cover. NIRNAE screens the entire release and utilisation record and ranks where scrutiny should go first.
Audit mandates
Each mandate is examined against records the institution already produces — no new reporting is imposed on the field.
Release-to-utilisation reconciliation across states and districts, with diversion between centrally sponsored and state pools surfaced separately.
Recurring grantees, entities appearing under multiple ministries, and utilisation certificates unsupported by underlying expenditure.
Splitting below tender ceilings, repeat awards to linked suppliers, and awards to firms registered shortly before the tender.
March-end dumping to prevent lapse of grant, and sanction-to-payment cycles completed within a single day.
Pass-through routing where a body hands most of the value to a single vendor without adding work.
A ranked brief with the arithmetic attached, prepared before external audit raises the same question.
Records examined
Standard exports. A date, an amount and a payee identifier per row is enough to begin; every additional column unlocks further tests.
Disclosure
Operating boundary. NIRNAE holds no live access to treasury, PFMS, banking or departmental systems. The department exports the records it wants examined and submits them. The product is in pre-deployment: engagements today are supervised pilots on exported or anonymised datasets, and every finding is an indicator for verification, not a determination. Full answers in the FAQ.
Leave a departmental email and we will arrange a briefing on a sample dataset.
Request a briefing