Uttar Pradesh

Put Uttar Pradesh's scheme spending through nine detection agents

Uttar Pradesh disburses across the widest district and block network in the country, which makes manual sampling structurally incomplete. NIRNAE reads the whole export rather than a sample and ranks entities by corroborated severity.

Uttar Pradesh · उत्तर प्रदेश

Who this is built for in the state

The offices that already hold the records. Nothing new has to be collected from the field.

Finance Department, Lok Bhawan

Budget and treasury wings with state-wide payment and release data.

Directorate of Treasuries

District-level payment registers, the first practical export for a full-year screen.

Vigilance Establishment

Payment-chain reconstruction and entity linkage supporting an open enquiry.

Rural and urban development departments

Block-level works and municipal contracts with high order volume and repeat agencies.

Audit mandates

Where the engine is applied in Uttar Pradesh

Each mandate is examined against records the department already produces.

Block and district works

Works fragmented below sanction limits, and vendors located far from the sanctioned work site.

Scheme fund utilisation

Expenditure booked to the wrong scheme or budget head, and releases parked with intermediaries.

Beneficiary integrity

Duplicate and near-duplicate beneficiaries across schemes, districts and disbursal cycles.

Contractor concentration

A small set of firms absorbing a disproportionate share of a district's awards.

Records examined

What the department sends

Standard exports. A date, an amount and a payee identifier per row is enough to begin.

  • 01Treasury payment registers
  • 02Scheme release and utilisation statements
  • 03Work orders and sanctions
  • 04Contractor masters
  • 05Beneficiary lists
  • 06Departmental expenditure abstracts

Scope

What it detects, and what it does not do

The boundary is the same in every state. Findings are indicators for verification, never determinations.

What it detects

  • Threshold evasion — payments split to stay under a sanction or tender ceiling
  • Vendor collusion — bidders sharing address, phone, bank account or directors
  • Ghost billing — non-measurable line items and bills repeated across years
  • Timing anomalies — year-end dumping, same-day sanction and payment
  • Geography mismatch — vendors far from the sanctioned work site
  • Circular routing — layered intermediaries that add no work

What it does not do

  • Confirm whether physical work actually happened on the ground
  • Read live treasury, PFMS, banking or departmental systems
  • Pronounce guilt, fraud or misconduct on any person or firm
  • Replace a statutory audit, enquiry or departmental proceeding

Related

Uttar Pradesh teams usually arrive looking for

  • Uttar Pradesh budget fraud detection
  • UP vigilance data analytics platform
  • सरकारी बजट जाँच यूपी

Disclosure

Operating boundary. NIRNAE holds no live access to treasury, PFMS, banking or departmental systems. The department exports the records it wants examined and submits them. The product is in pre-deployment: engagements today are supervised pilots on exported or anonymised datasets, and every finding is an indicator for verification, not a determination. Full answers in the FAQ.

Interested?

Leave a departmental email and we will arrange a briefing on a sample dataset.

Request a briefing